dear tactical voters...

Talk freely about the scene, the world of remixing, or anything off-topic unsuitable for the "Fun Forum".
User avatar
LMan
R64 Founder
R64 Founder
Posts: 3709
Joined: 21/11/2002 - 12:44
Contact:

Post by LMan »

CraigG wrote:Although in my browser, the top bar is always broken into three pieces on separate lines.
Any better now?
What browser do you use? I only checked Mozilla & IE.

- Markus
CraigG
Forum Celebrity
Forum Celebrity
Posts: 442
Joined: 22/11/2002 - 19:13
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by CraigG »

Ah, see, I'm one of those awkward Mac users, and I mostly use Safari (as do an absolute shed-load of Mac users now). However, although I'm awkward, I can also be helpful, so here's what I see on those pages:

Image

Safari is, on the whole, extremely standards-compliant, so I'm not sure what the problem might be.
Razmo
Forum God
Forum God
Posts: 1227
Joined: 11/11/2003 - 12:53
Location: Har Akir, Ravenloft

Post by Razmo »

Thanx LMan! :O)

That statistic view is really a nice thing. It gives you the nice abillity to see what the majority of the voters have voted. A single smiley showing a "very good" face, can be misleading, especially when the percentage is close to the "border" of another voting category (as with my two current remixes). nice feature! don't remove it! ;O)
Regards, Jess D. Skov-Nielsen (Razmo).
Image
User avatar
LMan
R64 Founder
R64 Founder
Posts: 3709
Joined: 21/11/2002 - 12:44
Contact:

Post by LMan »

Thanks razmo :)

Craig, how does it look now?

- Markus
CraigG
Forum Celebrity
Forum Celebrity
Posts: 442
Joined: 22/11/2002 - 19:13
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by CraigG »

Looks perfect to me now. Thanks for looking after us Mac users! :)
User avatar
tomsk
Forum Celebrity
Forum Celebrity
Posts: 379
Joined: 22/11/2002 - 20:09
Location: South Shields (nr Newcastle upon Tyne)
Contact:

Post by tomsk »

I agree - this is really good - and well put together. It also shows how little the 'poor' votes contribute to the overall rating (proving a point about poor votes having little effect)

Many thanks Lman - once again your hard work will (hopefully) pay dividend and maybe even end this discussion....maybe. Top work !
User avatar
Monty
Forum Loony
Forum Loony
Posts: 180
Joined: 13/01/2003 - 22:17
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post by Monty »

I agree too, superb work, Markus. 8)
Many thanks for that!

Cheers,
Monty
User avatar
ifadeo
Forum God
Forum God
Posts: 1155
Joined: 03/01/2003 - 16:12
Location: Düsseldorf, Germany

Post by ifadeo »

thanks LMan for your great effort.. very usefull this little add-on.... :D

...a little x-mas gift for us nasty remixers.... :wink:




cheers ifadeo
CraigG
Forum Celebrity
Forum Celebrity
Posts: 442
Joined: 22/11/2002 - 19:13
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by CraigG »

Well, even if it doesn't end the discussion, it does somewhat prove what Neil and Marcus have been arguing all along: how inconsequential those "bad" votes are to the overall score. After all, every track seems to have a couple.
Chris Abbott
Forum God
Forum God
Posts: 5307
Joined: 22/11/2002 - 12:21
Location: Dubai. No, not really.
Contact:

Post by Chris Abbott »

> Neil and Marcus have been arguing all along:
And me... I originally looked at the votes some time ago and officially posted the conclusion on this very forum that there was no anti-voting: and that it's the yellow smileys that drag marks down.

Chris
CraigG
Forum Celebrity
Forum Celebrity
Posts: 442
Joined: 22/11/2002 - 19:13
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by CraigG »

Well, even if it doesn't end the discussion, it does somewhat prove what Neil and Marcus (and Chris, who I totally forgot about, despite him now being the editor of this site, and despite having composed a two-thousand word interview with him for Pixelsurgeon) have been arguing all along: how inconsequential those "bad" votes are to the overall score. After all, every track seems to have a couple.

:)
User avatar
Jan Lund Thomsen
Forum Admin
Forum Admin
Posts: 1174
Joined: 25/11/2002 - 13:16
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

Post by Jan Lund Thomsen »

carlsson wrote:
DHS wrote:Can i refuse to upload my next works (if there will be any) to RKO, or must i comply with the mass?
:?: :?: :?:
Is there some deal for exclusive rights to publish remixes through the "official" channels if one has your own channels of distribution?
Nopes, not on my site, never. On the contrary.

RKO was never intended as an "official' channel for anything. That's all in people's heads.

"One-stop site" is prolly a better phrase for what I intended.

Or even "World Domination". No wait, that's Chris Abbott territory. :D
Chris Abbott
Forum God
Forum God
Posts: 5307
Joined: 22/11/2002 - 12:21
Location: Dubai. No, not really.
Contact:

Post by Chris Abbott »

> No wait, that's Chris Abbott territory.
You better believe it baby * chomps cigar *

<devil's advocate>
Actually Jan, you do call RKO "definitive" on the front page. Maybe you ought to rephrase? :)
</devil's advocate>
tas
R64 Founder
R64 Founder
Posts: 2345
Joined: 27/11/2002 - 15:02
Location: Doncaster

Post by tas »

actually chris is new page reads....."The page cannot be displayed"

I kinda like it, it's got a ring to it ;)
Chris Abbott
Forum God
Forum God
Posts: 5307
Joined: 22/11/2002 - 12:21
Location: Dubai. No, not really.
Contact:

Post by Chris Abbott »

> I kinda like it, it's got a ring to it
Yeah, but that's all style and no substance... ;-)

Chris
Post Reply